• Clinical Evidence

Measure of Safety for Q2Hour vs Q1Hour Glucose Checks for Intravenous Insulin Dosing

Setting: Cohort of five unaffiliated acute care hospitals

Objective

This retrospective study compares the safety and efficacy of two-hour blood glucose checks (q2hour) to one-hour blood glucose checks (q1hour) with use of an electronic glucose management system (EndoTool) for intravenous insulin dosing.

Setting

Cohort of five unaffiliated acute care hospitals.

Results

  • Incidence of hypoglycemia <70 mg/dL was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (0.24% vs 0.29% of blood glucose readings).
  • Percentage of blood glucose readings more than 5 minutes late was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (38.7% vs 44.3%).
  • Mean blood glucose was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (126 mg/dL vs 149 mg/dL).
  • Variance from mean was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (20% vs 25%).

Conclusions

Measures of hypoglycemia and blood glucose control observed with q2hour checks are superior to q1hour checks, affirming that EndoTool recommendations for q2hour checks are appropriate and hospitals can enjoy a positive impact to nursing workflow and reduced costs of care.

Objective

This retrospective study compares the safety and efficacy of two-hour blood glucose checks (q2hour) to one-hour blood glucose checks (q1hour) with use of an electronic glucose management system (EndoTool) for intravenous insulin dosing.

Setting

Cohort of five unaffiliated acute care hospitals.

Results
  • Incidence of hypoglycemia <70 mg/dL was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (0.24% vs 0.29% of blood glucose readings).
  • Percentage of blood glucose readings more than 5 minutes late was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (38.7% vs 44.3%).
  • Mean blood glucose was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (126 mg/dL vs 149 mg/dL).
  • Variance from mean was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (20% vs 25%).
Conclusions

Measures of hypoglycemia and blood glucose control observed with q2hour checks are superior to q1hour checks, affirming that EndoTool recommendations for q2hour checks are appropriate and hospitals can enjoy a positive impact to nursing workflow and reduced costs of care.

References

Authors

W. Patrick Burgess; Laura Santana; Chris Santry; Cathy Jaynes; Laurel Fuqua.

Source

Presented at American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Scientific & Clinical Congress.

Year

2019

Objective

This retrospective study compares the safety and efficacy of two-hour blood glucose checks (q2hour) to one-hour blood glucose checks (q1hour) with use of an electronic glucose management system (EndoTool) for intravenous insulin dosing.

Setting

Cohort of five unaffiliated acute care hospitals.

Results
  • Incidence of hypoglycemia <70 mg/dL was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (0.24% vs 0.29% of blood glucose readings).
  • Percentage of blood glucose readings more than 5 minutes late was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (38.7% vs 44.3%).
  • Mean blood glucose was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (126 mg/dL vs 149 mg/dL).
  • Variance from mean was lower for q2hour checks than q1hour checks (20% vs 25%).
Conclusions

Measures of hypoglycemia and blood glucose control observed with q2hour checks are superior to q1hour checks, affirming that EndoTool recommendations for q2hour checks are appropriate and hospitals can enjoy a positive impact to nursing workflow and reduced costs of care.

References

Authors

W. Patrick Burgess; Laura Santana; Chris Santry; Cathy Jaynes; Laurel Fuqua.

Source

Presented at American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Scientific & Clinical Congress.

Year

2019

Short and Sweet Headlines are Best!

Get in Touch

Ready to get started?

Fill in your details and one of our friendly team members will be in touch to show you how easily EndoTool can support your hospital.

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.