• Clinical Evidence

Glycemic Control in the Burn Intensive Care Unit, Focus on the Role of Anemia in Glucose Measurement

Setting: Largest (425-bed) U.S. military hospital, academic medical center and Level 1 trauma center.

Objective

This study examines glycemic control challenges in a burn patient population, effects of glycemic variability on outcomes, and benefits of a computerized decision support system (EndoTool) over a traditional paper protocol for the management of intensive insulin therapy.

Setting

Largest (425-bed) U.S. military hospital, academic medical center and Level 1 trauma center.

Results

  • Compared to a traditional paper protocol, EndoTool provided better glycemic control in the 80-110 mg/dL target range without increased hypoglycemic events.
  • Additionally, nurses accepted EndoTool insulin dosing recommendations more often than they followed a traditional paper protocol.

Conclusions

EndoTool outperforms a traditional paper protocol for the management of intensive insulin therapy and is considered standard of care for glucose control in a burn intensive care unit.

Objective

This study examines glycemic control challenges in a burn patient population, effects of glycemic variability on outcomes, and benefits of a computerized decision support system (EndoTool) over a traditional paper protocol for the management of intensive insulin therapy.

Setting

Largest (425-bed) U.S. military hospital, academic medical center and Level 1 trauma center.

Results
  • Compared to a traditional paper protocol, EndoTool provided better glycemic control in the 80-110 mg/dL target range without increased hypoglycemic events.
  • Additionally, nurses accepted EndoTool insulin dosing recommendations more often than they followed a traditional paper protocol.
Conclusions

EndoTool outperforms a traditional paper protocol for the management of intensive insulin therapy and is considered standard of care for glucose control in a burn intensive care unit.

References

Authors

Elizabeth Mann, RN; Alejandra Mora, BS; Heather Pidcoke, MD, Steven Wolf, MD, and Charles Wade, PhD.

Source

Published in Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Volume 3, Issue 6, p1319-1329.

Year

2009

Objective

This study examines glycemic control challenges in a burn patient population, effects of glycemic variability on outcomes, and benefits of a computerized decision support system (EndoTool) over a traditional paper protocol for the management of intensive insulin therapy.

Setting

Largest (425-bed) U.S. military hospital, academic medical center and Level 1 trauma center.

Results
  • Compared to a traditional paper protocol, EndoTool provided better glycemic control in the 80-110 mg/dL target range without increased hypoglycemic events.
  • Additionally, nurses accepted EndoTool insulin dosing recommendations more often than they followed a traditional paper protocol.
Conclusions

EndoTool outperforms a traditional paper protocol for the management of intensive insulin therapy and is considered standard of care for glucose control in a burn intensive care unit.

References

Authors

Elizabeth Mann, RN; Alejandra Mora, BS; Heather Pidcoke, MD, Steven Wolf, MD, and Charles Wade, PhD.

Source

Published in Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Volume 3, Issue 6, p1319-1329.

Year

2009

Short and Sweet Headlines are Best!

Get in Touch

Ready to get started?

Fill in your details and one of our friendly team members will be in touch to show you how easily EndoTool can support your hospital.

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.